<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Beales &#187; Real World Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbeales.com/category/real-world-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbeales.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 02:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://johnbeales.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Would the MacBook Touch Really be Useful?</title>
		<link>http://johnbeales.com/20080729/would-the-macbook-touch-really-be-useful/</link>
		<comments>http://johnbeales.com/20080729/would-the-macbook-touch-really-be-useful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch screen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbeales.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of talk recently about a MacBook Touch &#8211; a Mac laptop with a touch screen, perhaps in tablet form, but each time I read a speculation like this I wonder &#8211; would a MacBook Touch really be useful? I sit at a desk, (or on a couch sometimes), and work on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/07/29/feasibility-of-touch-screen-apple-notebooks/">a</a> <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jul2008/tc20080728_737280.htm">lot</a> <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/07/25/speculation-about-a-macbook-touch-builds/">of</a> <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/17942/">talk</a> <a href="http://www.divine.ca/forum/en/viewtopic.php?t=862">recently</a> about a MacBook Touch &#8211; a Mac laptop with a touch screen, perhaps in tablet form, but each time I read a speculation like this I wonder &#8211; would a MacBook Touch really be useful?</p>
<p><div id="attachment_103" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 254px"><a href="http://johnbeales.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/macbook-touch.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-103" title="MacBook Touch?" src="http://johnbeales.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/macbook-touch.jpg" alt="Found at shinyshiny.tv/2008/07/rumour_macbook.html" width="244" height="207" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image found at http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2008/07/rumour_macbook.html</p></div></p>
<p>I sit at a desk, (or on a couch sometimes), and work on my MacBook Pro.  I spend most of my time coding in PHP, Javascript, HTML, or CSS, and I use the trackpad to control the mouse.  This way I rarely have to move my hands, (I know it sounds lazy).  I find that I can get things done fastest working like this.  If my computer were to have a touch, (or multi-touch), screen I would have to lift my arms, touch the screen, then find my position again on the keyboard.  I know it would be fast, but multiplied by a thousand, (or however many times I interact with the mouse), per day it would take a lot of time.  Really, if I can drag something across the screen by moving one finger five cenimetres on the trackpad, why would I involve my whole arm in dragging something twenty-five centimetres across the screen?  Call me lazy, but it seems like a lot of unneeded work to me.</p>
<p>Another more minor issue would be the dirty, dirty screen.  My screens, (on all of my computers, not just the MacBook Pro), get pretty dirty, I they would probably get pretty disgusting if I was touching them all of the time, instead of just sometimes as I do now.  True, I could, (and would), clean the screen, but it&#8217;s not just a one and a half second wipe like on an iPhone or iPod Touch &#8211; I imagine that it would get annoying after a while.</p>
<p>A tablet form factor would reduce these problems.  I have never owned a Tablet PC myself, but the demos I&#8217;ve seen were pretty cool and I can see how they would be useful in some situations, but for everyday computing I don&#8217;t really see how the added cost of a touch screen would give a MacBook Touch any added value.</p>
<p>Of course, they usually seem to figure out how to do it down there at Apple, so if they are actually working on a MacBook Touch, it may be excellent, we&#8217;ll have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnbeales.com/20080729/would-the-macbook-touch-really-be-useful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ice Hotel QuÃ©bec</title>
		<link>http://johnbeales.com/20070302/ice-hotel-quebec/</link>
		<comments>http://johnbeales.com/20070302/ice-hotel-quebec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Camera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbeales.com/20070302/ice-hotel-quebec/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last weekend I had the opportunity to visit the Ice Hotel QuÃ©bec-Canada. I had heard that the ice hotel was amazing but wasn&#8217;t prepared for what I saw. The things they have done up by QuÃ©bec with ice and show are incredible. Now I&#8217;m going to let the pictures do the talking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last weekend I had the opportunity to visit the <a href="http://www.icehotel-canada.com/en/index.en.php" title="Go to the Ice Hotel website">Ice Hotel QuÃ©bec-Canada</a>.  I had heard that the ice hotel was amazing but wasn&#8217;t prepared for what I saw.  The things they have done up by QuÃ©bec with ice and show are incredible.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m going to let <a href="http://www.icehotel-canada.com/en/index.en.php" title="My Ice Hotel photos on Flickr">the pictures</a> do the talking.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnbeales/408190707/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/160/408190707_648ca2a212.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="the Chapel" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnbeales.com/20070302/ice-hotel-quebec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007 Dodge Magnum</title>
		<link>http://johnbeales.com/20070214/real-world-design-2007-dodge-magnum/</link>
		<comments>http://johnbeales.com/20070214/real-world-design-2007-dodge-magnum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnbeales.com/20070214/real-world-design-2007-dodge-magnum/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the weekend I took a little trip to Toronto and Niagara Falls. To get there I rented a car, (pictured right, it was cheaper than the train). The photos aren&#8217;t that great, I forgot my camera so had to make do with my phone. After reserving the smallest car possible online with Hertz I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.johnbeales.com/images/magnum.jpg" alt="2007 Dodge Magnum XST" class="alignright" width="269" height="194" />Over the weekend I took a little trip to Toronto and Niagara Falls.  To get there I rented a car, (pictured right, it was cheaper than the train). The photos aren&#8217;t that great, I forgot my camera so had to make do with my phone. After reserving the smallest car possible online with <a href="http://www.hertz.ca">Hertz</a> I showed up and was told that the smallest they had in was a Dodge Magnum. That&#8217;s like a free upgrade to business class on the plane!</p>
<p>Once I had my great car I took the weekend to enjoy it, and the pleasures of Toronto and Niagra Falls.  While driving though, I noticed several things about the Dodge Magnum that I would do differently and thought that this car is an excellent example of real-world design, (as opposed to the web-world of design I usually am immersed in), but had a few things that could be changed.</p>
<p><strong>What I like</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve seen a Magnum you probably already know the good.  This car looks awesome. Whoever came up with the look of this car is a genius.  They&#8217;ve taken a station wagon and made it really cool. My neighbours and girlfriend thought it looked like a mini-limo. The car looks fast, powerful, and aggressive.</p>
<p>The interior is great too.  It&#8217;s spacious and has lots of storage space.  My SXT, (not the top-end model), had a pretty decent sound system as well, and I could hook up my iPod to it.</p>
<p>Even though the SXT&#8217;s 250 horsepowerful engine is much less powerful than the top of the line HEMIs it provides enough power for highway driving with a slight load.</p>
<p><strong>What I would change</strong></p>
<p><img src="/images/magnumlevers.jpg" width="250" height="164" alt="Control levers on the left side of the steering wheel" class="alignleft" />The first thing that I noticed when I started to drive was that there is an extra lever on the left side of the steering wheel where I only expect to find the turning signal control, (pictured left). This is the cruise control and is quite annoying until you get used to it.  I couldn&#8217;t see either of the two levers while driving and don&#8217;t feel I should have to look down to signal, and every time I tried to turn I would try to signal with the cruise control.  When driving on the highway it was handy to have the cruise in such an accessable place but I suspect most people will spend much more time in the city than on the highway and will want the cruise put somewhere else.</p>
<p><img src="/images/magnumview.jpg" width="250" height="188" alt="Driver's side shoulder check view" class="alignright" />When trying to do a shoulder check on the driver&#8217;s side of the car I found my view was mostly of pillars and I didn&#8217;t see much road, (pictured right). Visibility in general in the Magnum is not as great as it could be, however, this is a large car and with larger vehicles come larger blindspots.</p>
<p>One other thing I noticed about this car, although this isn&#8217;t a design issue, is the fuel economy.  The SXT is powerful, but not extremely powerful, however it still uses a lot of gas.  I barely made it from Montr&eague;al to Toronto on a tank of gas, which worked out to something like 514 kilometers on 63 liters of gas, not that great.  I can&#8217;t imagine how much gas the high-end HEMIs must burn.</p>
<p>Overall, the Dodge Magnum is a great car, however I wouldn&#8217;t buy it because of the odd placement of the cruise control, the bad sightlines, and the bad fuel economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnbeales.com/20070214/real-world-design-2007-dodge-magnum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

